Abstract:

 This article reconstructs restraint as a political virtue that orders judgement across time, drawing on Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Weber to distil a grammar in which situational awareness widens perception before choice contracts, proportionality fits means to ends while inscribing an exit into the design of action, and responsibility takes custody of foreseeable consequences as part of the intention itself. From these threads it builds a portable framework for auditing foreign-policy choices across regimes and crises. The framework is tested through two compact applications that privilege fit over narrative detail: the Cuban Missile Crisis, where staged coercion and a backchannel settlement preserved freedom to manoeuvre, and Iraq 2003, where maximal aims riding on thin means without a credible exit converted speed into strategic drag. Together these cases demonstrate the framework’s payoff, namely evaluative clarity and usable guidance for scholars and practitioners.

Keywords:

Restraint, Proportionality, Thucydides, Machiavelli, Cuban Missile Crisis